Release payment when the condition is met
The pallet is scanned at the depot and the carrier is paid. The agreed rule holds the release, both parties are checked, and the payment is recorded with the reason for it. Your team decides which scanner, inspector or other source can confirm the event.
The work finished on Tuesday. The payment goes Friday.
A delivery is confirmed in one system. The payment for it is released, later, by a person working in another. Between those two moments sits a delay, a reconciliation, a cash-flow gap, and a reliable source of error — repeated across every transaction a business makes. Anything released by hand today is where the agreed rule closes the gap.
The gap is not a software failure so much as an architectural one. Money and logic were digitised separately, so nothing bridges them except a person reading one screen and typing into another. The signed agreement holds the release rule, and the payment acts on evidence from a source your team trusts.
Four steps, and one record at the end.
Write the rule into the contract
On delivery, on inspection, on completion, per unit consumed.
The condition is observed
A scanner reports, a meter submits a reading, the other side signs.
Payment executes
The carrier is paid, and both sides were checked first. Anyone you pay.
The record is the receipt
Neuro records the payment beside the trusted event that released it. Finance can inspect both without matching separate approval and payment logs.
What controls the release.
A scan at the depot releases a payment to a checked carrier.
Programmatic payments
Your money moves on a rule, not a reminder.
Agreements
The agreement you would take to counsel is the one that runs.
Digital Identity
Both sides of your payment are proved as it executes.
The rule usually belongs to an asset.
The same trigger pays a carrier, a charge point, or a stake in an asset.